Saturday, June 3, 2017

Pedophile Recidivisim







No cure for one whose core is evil; prosecute and incarcerate.
Untitled
A Scottish teacher jailed for abducting his 15-year-old pupil to France could face prison time after his victim revealed that he contacted her on Facebook. 
Aberdeenshire born Jeremy Forrest sparked an international manhunt when he fled to France with a 15-year-old pupil, who cannot be named for legal reasons, in 2012. 
His victim, has spoken out for the first time about their relationship and the events that led to his arrest and trial.
She also revealed to Cosmopolitan that Jeremy attempted to contact her on social media networking site Facebook after his release from prison.
She said: “Since Jeremy’s release from prison, we have only spoken once, about a year ago, after I messaged a Facebook account with his name that came up as a suggested friend.”
“He sounded the same and, importantly, happy – he even had a new girlfriend.”
The message exchange may prompt an investigation as it breaches a licence that ordered Jeremy not to have contact with her. 
Forrest, originally from Inverurie in Aberdeenshire, was a married maths teacher at Bishop Bell School in Eastbourne, East Sussex, when he began a sexual relationship with one of his students. 
He was convicted for five-and-a-half years and was released from prison two years ago. 
The 15-year-old revealed the pair got close on a school trip to the USA when she was just 14. The pair began exchanging messages on Twitter before starting to meet up regularly outside of school. 
The girl, referred to as Gemma for legal reasons, had sex with the maths teacher who she thought of as her boyfriend, after her 15th birthday. 
The pair took a ferry to France under false names in a bid to set up a new life.
Forrest was spotted in Bordeaux and arrested eight days later. 
She said: “Of course we knew it was illegal for us to be together, but we genuinely believed that if we stuck it out for a tricky few years, eventually we could return home and people would accept our relationship.”
“Right up until the very last moment I thought things might be OK, and that people would understand how we’d fallen in love, but when he was found guilty of child abduction and sex with a minor, I broke down in the dock beside his family.”
The pair had not seen each other since 2013 at Lewes Crown Court in East Sussex when she was forced to give evidence against Jeremy during the trial. 
Speaking of their relationship Gemma* revealed she never felt like a victim and she had encouraged his advances.
She said: “I’m still asking myself that now. All I know is, at the time, it didn’t feel that way; it was me who followed Jeremy on Twitter and I welcomed the advances he made in response.”
Since his release Jeremy has reinvented himself and found a new relationship, despite claims he would return to the girl after his release.

http://www.heraldscotland.com/news/15324705.Scots_paedophile_teacher_could_face_jail_again_after_schoolgirl_he_fled_with_reveals_he_contacted_her/  https://archive.is/OmF9e

Sunday, May 28, 2017

Psychological Short-Commings: Terrorists/Educators


Better to teach children that those that exploit children are the terrorists they need to be conscious of.

Write a Letter To Terrorists! Children Told to ‘Respect’ Killers In New Teaching Aid

Courtesy of  Mr Jon Coates &Sunday Express
http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/810115/school-children-told-respect-killers-teaching-aid-talking-about-terrorism


Write a Letter To Terrorists! Children Told to ‘Respect’ Killers In New Teaching Aid

A NEW teaching aid that recommends schoolchildren as young as seven “write a letter to a terrorist” to help understand their motives has been condemned as “dangerous and misguided”.

SchoolchildGETTY STOCK IMAGE
New teaching aid that recommends schoolchildren as young as seven ‘write a letter to a terrorist’
The book, Talking About Terrorism, published weeks before the , describes the indiscriminate mass murder of innocent members of the public as a “type of war”.It tells primary age children that terrorists kill people because they believe they are being treated “unfairly and not shown respect”. It gives examples of “” whose ideas then turn out to be right: “The Suffragettes used violence and were called terrorists,,,,” it stated.
Talking About Terrorism bookBRILLIANT
The book, Talking About Terrorism, was published weeks before the Manchester Arena atrocity
“Today many people think of them as brave women and admire their struggle for the right to vote.”
his a crackpot idea based on the misguided notion that primary school children must engage with, and show ‘respect’ for, religious fanatics who are seeking to kill them
Chris McGovern – Campaign for Real Education chairman
In an activity recommended for pupils aged seven to 11, teachers are urged to “invite children to write a letter to a terrorist. If they could ask a terrorist six questions, what would they be?”The book, published by Brilliant Publications and containing a foreword by Peter Wanless, the chief executive of the NSPCC, has been slammed by critics who say it is potentially dangerous. Chris McGovern, chairman of the Campaign for Real Education, said the letter task would confuse and potentially upset pupils.
Demonstration of suffragettes in LondonGETTY STOCK IMAGE
‘The Suffragettes used violence and were called terrorists’ the book claims
He said: “This a crackpot idea based on the misguided notion that primary school children must engage with, and show “respect” for, religious fanatics who are seeking to kill them.“It is part of the “British Values” agenda that is being forced on schools by Ofsted and the educational establishment. “The primary school classroom is not the place to humanise terrorism by ‘pretend dialogue’.”
In trying to help children “understand” terrorists’ motives, the book invites sympathy for the killers, critics claim.
And by invoking the Suffragettes and Nelson Mandela, it leads children to question whether terrorism might be justifiable, they say.

Sunday, May 21, 2017

Savage Abuse a Global Outrage


Global awareness becomes a contemporary trend.

South African rally protests violence against women and children

Protesters, most of them men, have marched through the streets of South Africa’s capital to protest violence against women. Individual cases have attracted international attention.
Südafrika Pretoria - #Not in my Name Protest gegen Gewalt gegen Frauen (Getty Images/AFP/W. de Wet)
Under the banner “Not in my name, forward with women and down with women abuse,” hundreds of protesters walked from Church Square in the heart of Pretoria on Saturday.
They were drawing attention to the rising violence against women in South Africa. A woman dressed in white and carrying a suitcase led the march through the streets to Union Buildings. She represented all women who were ever abused or suffered under the cruelty of men, organizers said.
Südafrika Pretoria - #Not in my Name Protest gegen Gewalt gegen Frauen (Getty Images/AFP/W. de Wet)Leading the march was a woman in white symbolizing all those who had experienced violence.
According to official South African figures, a woman is killed by someone she knows every eight hours and one woman in five has been subjected to at least one act of violent aggression in her life.
March participants said not enough was being done to stop the violence.
“The time to take collective responsibility for our shameful action is now,” said Kholofelo Masha, one of the rally’s organizers.
Masha said men had stayed quiet on the issue for too long.
“You hear a lady screaming next door, you decide to sleep when you know there is a problem,” he said. “No man should beat a woman or rape a woman.
“We men are taking a stand today,” Masha said. “Women must know that they can count on us.”
Südafrika Pretoria - #Not in my Name Protest gegen Gewalt gegen Frauen (Getty Images/AFP/W. de Wet)The protest followed an increase in the number of reports of women being raped and murdered
International attention
Individual cases have drawn international attention to domestic violence in South Africa. Reeva Steenkamp was killed by her partner Oscar Pistorius, the Paralympic athlete on Valentine’s Day in 2013.
Last week, President Jacob Zuma visited the parents of a 3-year-old girl who was raped and killed.
“We as the citizens of this country must say enough is enough,” Zuma said. “This is one of the saddest incidents I’ve come across. It’s a crisis in the country, the manner in which women and children are being killed.”
The ruling African National Congress party has called the violence “senseless and barbaric” while the opposition Democratic Alliance party has called for a national debate on the problem, condemning what it called a “failure to make South Africa safe for all.”
jm/sms (AFP)

Sunday, May 14, 2017

Child Exploitors: Master Manulipators



The art of those whose core is evil.

Playing the victim

  • They tend to manipulate or abuse others verbally or physically, but then blame the other person (i.e. the real victim) for provoking the abuse.

  • They influence or control other people’ sympathy to gain compassion or support.

  • They form friendships or intimate relationships with those who disrespect, mistreat or abuse them to convince themselves and the world of their unfortunate status.

  • They tend to avoid taking responsibility for their life, instead blaming others for their mistreatment or unfortunate circumstances.

  • They think and talk a lot about how others take advantage of their kindness.

Saturday, April 29, 2017

Evil Lurks in all Areanas


A copycat virtuoso of the Chicago Suburban Child Abuse Cult?

Former Judge and Trump's Campaign chair in Kentucky arrested for child sex trafficking

We are told pedophiles come in all bi-partisan varieties, including pillars of the community such as judges, police officers, teachers, and doctors.
The recent arrest of Tim Nolan, a 70-year-old former district judge and former chair of Trump’s campaign, is a case in point.

Scott Wartman reports for Cincinnati.com, April 21, 2017, that the arrest of former Kentucky Campbell County District Judge Tim Nolan on charges of human trafficking and unlawful transaction with a minor has shocked the community.
Nolan, 70, was a district judge in the 1970s and 1980s. He is outspoken in conservative politics and the tea party movement, and was elected to the Campbell County School Board last November. He was also the chairman of Donald Trump’s presidential campaign in Campbell County.
Court documents don’t give much detail about the incident or incidents that led to the charges. This much we do know, according to the criminal complaint:
  • In August 2016, Nolan gave alcohol to and induced a minor of unspecified age into illegal sexual activity.
  • In February 2017, Campbell County Police served a search warrant on Nolan’s property in southern Campbell County.
The case presents a tricky situation for the legal community due to Nolan being a former Campbell County District Judge and his daughter, Taunya Nolan Jack, is the Campbell County Circuit Court Clerk.
To avoid conflicts of interests, a special judge from out of the area, District Court Judge Elizabeth Chandler from Carroll County, is presiding over the case and all court documents are being filed in Boone County. The attorney general’s office is prosecuting.
It is not clear what action the Campbell County School Board will take. Chairwoman Janis Winbigler referred all questions to the district office, saying, “We’re just learning about this. The board is immensely troubled by this.” Superintendent David Rust did not immediately return calls for comment.
The arrest has some veteran lawyers and judges scratching their heads. Retired family court judge Mickey Foellger who, as an attorney in the Campbell County attorney’s office, had worked with Nolan, said Nolan had a reputation as being a strict judge that “leaned to the tougher” side of sentencing. Foellger said, “I can’t imagine what he did. I don’t want to speculate. It’s mind-boggling that he would be with an underage girl.”
On April 21, Nolan was released on $50,000 bond and placed on an ankle monitor. He is scheduled for a preliminary hearing on May 5.

Saturday, April 22, 2017

Investigating Civil Servants


Uncovering abuse of children in the hands of agencies that are expected to protect them.

Local Authorities’ Handling Of Neglected Children To Be Investigated.

The government has just announced that it will carry out a series of inspections on public bodies working with neglected children.
The inspections which will start in May this year, aim to assess how effectively organisations like local authorities, police and probation services work together to help and protect children aged between 7 and 15, the age group considered to be most at risk of neglect, abuse and exploitation.
There will be 6 inspections, which from May until December will focus on children’s experiences at the hands of these organisations. Findings highlighting what works and what needs to be improved will be published when all six inspections are complete.
A further overview report will then be published to offer guidance on good practice in this area.
An initial series of inspections were carried out in January 2016 which looked at children at risk of sexual exploitation, and those who went missing from school or care.
We hope the latest round of inspections reveal the deep dysfunction amongst these organisations who continue to work against, rather than with, each other. There is still an enormous amount of mistrust between agencies like the police and the local authority, which often has serious consequences for the children in their care.
We’ll keep you up to date with any developments.
Thank you to Nick for alerting us to this item.
A new set of inspections will examine how local partner agencies - including local authorities, health and probation services and the police - are working together to protect children living with, or at risk of, neglect.
The series of 6 joint targeted area inspections (JTAI) involving Ofsted, Care Quality Commission (CQC), HMI Constabulary and HMI Probation will begin in May this year.
JTAI assess how effectively agencies are working together in their local area to help and protect children. Each set of joint inspections also evaluates the multi-agency response to a particular issue or theme.
Following feedback from key stakeholders, the four inspectorates decided that the latest series of JTAI should look at local support services for children living with neglect. In particular, the inspections will focus on the experiences of children aged between 7 and 15 years old, who may be at higher risk of going missing or being exploited, or who exhibit challenging behaviours in adolescence.
Guidance published today sets out how the inspections will work in practice.
Uniquely for this JTAI, inspectors will also speak with school leaders and staff to get a wider picture of how neglect is identified and referred.
HM Chief Inspector Amanda Spielman said:
Identifying signs of neglect in middle childhood and adolescence can be very complex, as children at this age experience and respond to neglect differently from younger children. However, at any age, the impact of childhood neglect can be lifelong.
It’s crucial that local partner agencies understand the long-term effects of neglect and recognise the need for early and appropriate intervention.
These inspections will provide valuable insight into the local area response to neglect. And importantly, they will highlight good practice that others can learn from.
Professor Steve Field, Chief Inspector of General Practice at the Care Quality Commission, said:
Neglect is a terrible and far-reaching problem that can present itself in many aspects of a child’s life. We all have a responsibility to safeguard those children who find themselves at risk of neglect, and that means understanding where these risks might be and also where services are doing great work to support children in their area.
By focusing on individual children’s experiences and tracking them across services, these inspections will provide an invaluable chance to see how agencies are working together and the impact this has on the welfare of young people.
HM Inspector of Constabulary, Wendy Williams, said:
It is important that all police officers have the correct knowledge to fully understand the signs of neglect. As HMIC has said previously, although the protection of the vulnerable is not just the responsibility of the police, police officers will often be the first point of contact for vulnerable victims.
These inspections aim to provide an understanding of how the police works with partner agencies not just to identify child neglect, but also to provide the best possible support and protection to keep children safe.
HM Chief Inspector of Probation, Dame Glenys Stacey, said:
Many of the children of adult offenders may be experiencing neglect. This programme will give us the opportunity to examine and report on the work of probation providers in improving the lives of children and young people living in very difficult circumstances. Youth offending teams supervise many children and young people who have experienced and continue to experience neglect in childhood and towards adulthood.
We will identify the extent to which youth offending teams work with these children and young people to reduce the impact of neglect and improve their life chances.
Each inspection report will include narrative findings, clearly setting out what local partners are doing well and what they need to do to improve.
In 2014, Ofsted produced a report on local arrangements to safeguard neglected children under the age of 10. This multi-agency review of the experiences of older neglected children will build on that evidence base.
When all 6 inspections are complete, an overview report will be published to highlight learning and good practice on the theme of childhood neglect.




s300_children_leaning_on_wall

Monday, April 17, 2017

Acitivists Expose Judicial Shortcommings


Investigations and research are a pretrial necessity.

Judge Accused of being “Bent as a Banana” in child abuse case

Investigative journalist Richard Carvath has called Judge Jeremy Lea “as bent as a banana”

It has been hard to work out the truth of this case in Nottinghamshire.
Partly this is due to
  • lack of information
  • court restrictions
  • having worked out the establishments official story, there is the problem of judging how close this is to the truth.
Naturally I have no wish to adversely affect any cases that may be brought, nor do I wish to fall foul of any restrictions that I do not even know about.
It appears a family court judgment made a mothers two boys, ward of the court. It was critical of her but the mother (Samantha Baldwin) ignored the judgment took the children with her, against the wishes of the authorities. She was “missing” for several days and then went to police who have taken now taken the children from her. In the meantime the police and family courts have issued statements. It appears that family members were threatened with charges of helping the mother take the children.
                                                    Samantha Baldwin in happier times
Two useful posts on the case are from the Transparency Project.
2017 Apr 3 Police hunt for mother who has abducted her own children – what on earth is going on? [15]
This post summarises what was known on the 3rd and 4th of April and has links to several corporate media articles if people wish to research them. They do not seem to add much to the facts, and corporate media almost never link to sources, so I will not reference them here.
The Transparency Project article states that on 27 Mar the Family Court held a hearing about these two boys. It decided to declare the boys wards of court. Probably on 3 Apr the Family Court then issued a statement via the police website, which now appears to be unavailable, which included
Miss Baldwin is now missing. It is assumed that she has abducted [the children]. The children have now been made wards of Court. Miss Baldwin is considered to pose a risk of harm to the children.”

Superintendent Richard Fretwell of Nottinghamshire Police was in charge of the search for Samantha Baldwin.
The article then explains some useful definitions such as abduction and custody.
The next article, 2017 Apr 10 Samantha Baldwin – another side to a very sad story [16] has more useful information.

It contains links and copies of
  • text of a judgment read out in open court (and hence reportable)
  • statement from the children’s father David Madge
The article states
  • the mother made allegations of sexual abuse of the boys by the father, and others, some years ago;
  • these were the subject of a lengthy fact-finding hearing very recently (12 days, which is a significant duration for a trial in a private law case), but it seems likely that any criminal investigation associated with this hearing did not lead to charges against the father;
  • after 12 days of evidence from the parents, and a host of other witnesses and consideration of more than 2,000 pages of documents, the judge decided that the mother had failed to prove that it was more likely than not that her allegations were true, although she did genuinely believe them to be true;
  • more than that, he found that she was so convinced that the allegations were true that she had gone to the lengths of drugging the boys in order to bolster the case that the children were victims of abuse – in essence she fabricated evidence in the hope of securing the finding she believed was justified;
  • and the judge found that when the mother realised the writing was on the wall, she made a plan and then whisked the children away to her chalet to prevent the court from acting on its judgment.
  • The children are now temporarily in foster care – the reason given for them not returning immediately to the care of their father is that as a result of their mother’s own irrational belief, they may now have a false belief that they were in fact abused by their father. It also appears that they have not had contact with, let alone been cared for by their father for some years.
That then appears to be a summary of the official position. Supporters of Samantha Baldwin, which include investigative reporter Richard Carvath think this is not an accurate picture. He also claims court papers have been served on him and he has been gagged.
He says that he has to balance getting the truth to the public whilst still protecting the legally admissible evidence that is needed to seek justice for them. (OBO stands for On Behalf Of, and it appears that someone is operating his twitter account, presumably with his permission)